Difference between revisions of "User talk:Iduan"
(Thank you so much) |
|||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==Replied== | ==Replied== | ||
Sent you one back, dear sir! :) [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:13, 27 May 2011 (EDT) | Sent you one back, dear sir! :) [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:13, 27 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==#1 on Google== | ||
| + | [[Barack Hussein Obama]], since the recent upgrade, has lead frogged ahead of Wikipedia's article, and Mr. Barack Obama's very own website to occupy the [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ACAW_enUS425US426&q=barack+hussein+obama #1 position on Google]. Thank you, it was a brilliant idea, and very well executed. It is someting you need to be very proud, and we all appreciate your excellent work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If I can be of any futher assistance, please don't hesitate to let me know. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:25, 5 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:25, June 6, 2011
| ||||||||||||||||
Editing Liberal FriendshipThe edits were to correct erroneous information, remove opinion, and to put tags in to get citations for claims that were unsourced. I was under the impression that's what we do with an encyclopedia. This site isnt here to smear people. HarabecW
I apologize if I went about correcting something in the wrong way, but I fail to see how this being a conservative site matters. If you want an encyclopedia, then you dont get to play cut and paste with factual events and ideas if you want to call this site an encyclopedia, as it clearly does. --HarabecW 16:04, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
my editYou do know that you should include Nixon acts for the Enviroment. It seems that any things that even sounds liberal you delete even of it is a fact. You can't slant facts. As I don't have as much time as you seem to have you should also include he ended the draft.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Conservative134 (talk)
I reverted you (here) not for your content but because you very clearly copied from Wikipedia. You even left in the citation number (that stray "[108]"? I know what that is). So, again, let's be clear, I reverted your edit because it was careless plagiarism - it had nothing to do with content censorship. Also, new sections go on the bottom of talk pages and you should sign your edits (--~~~~).--IDuan 16:01, 11 May 2011 (EDT) RepliedSent you one back, dear sir! :) Karajou 01:13, 27 May 2011 (EDT) #1 on GoogleBarack Hussein Obama, since the recent upgrade, has lead frogged ahead of Wikipedia's article, and Mr. Barack Obama's very own website to occupy the #1 position on Google. Thank you, it was a brilliant idea, and very well executed. It is someting you need to be very proud, and we all appreciate your excellent work. If I can be of any futher assistance, please don't hesitate to let me know. Rob Smith 22:25, 5 June 2011 (EDT) |