Difference between revisions of "User talk:BobSherman"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
(→Sumerian article: Crystalinks as a source?: Way to apologise for your mistake!) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::By the way, you have been labeled as a parodist. I would go over your previous edits and make any changes that may be necessary. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:25, 15 July 2011 (EDT) | ::::By the way, you have been labeled as a parodist. I would go over your previous edits and make any changes that may be necessary. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:25, 15 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::::You are correct about the crystalinks source. However, you still have been labeled as someone who is probably a parodist. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:15, 15 July 2011 (EDT) | :::::You are correct about the crystalinks source. However, you still have been labeled as someone who is probably a parodist. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:15, 15 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::::Wow! Way to apologise for your mistake, Conservative. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 09:52, 15 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:52, July 15, 2011
Welcome to my talk page (if you are a believer in God, the Bible, and the conservative cause).
Welcome!
Hello, BobSherman, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, BobSherman!
- Joaquín Martínez 08:58, 11 July 2011 (EDT)
Thank you very much! BobSherman 02:47, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
Sumerian article: Crystalinks as a source?
Crystalinks as a source? From a cursory glance it appears to be flaky New Age and/or pagan website. You User page's has some contentions that are very poor as well. You need to step up your game if you want to remain an editor. Conservative 02:55, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- My only contribution to the Sumerians page was that last bit about how the irrigation is in conflict with Creation; I didn't write anything else including what was cited by "crystalinks." To be honest, I didn't look up that source to see how reputable it is. If I were you, I'd go after whoever cited the pagan source instead of me. BobSherman 03:14, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- By the way, you have been labeled as a parodist. I would go over your previous edits and make any changes that may be necessary. Conservative 03:25, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- You are correct about the crystalinks source. However, you still have been labeled as someone who is probably a parodist. Conservative 05:15, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- Wow! Way to apologise for your mistake, Conservative. TracyS 09:52, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- You are correct about the crystalinks source. However, you still have been labeled as someone who is probably a parodist. Conservative 05:15, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- By the way, you have been labeled as a parodist. I would go over your previous edits and make any changes that may be necessary. Conservative 03:25, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- My only contribution to the Sumerians page was that last bit about how the irrigation is in conflict with Creation; I didn't write anything else including what was cited by "crystalinks." To be honest, I didn't look up that source to see how reputable it is. If I were you, I'd go after whoever cited the pagan source instead of me. BobSherman 03:14, 15 July 2011 (EDT)