Difference between revisions of "Debate:Should RobS lose his Sysop rights?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Uhhh, this really isn't a debate. It's a poll. In response to User:Conservative pressuring the site owner to abandon established site policies and invoke mob rule, please indicate your votes below. Note:User participation here will be exempt from the 90/10 rule, however there's no guarantee you may not suffer a reprisal block. I will however do whatever I can to help if that were to happen.
m (fmt) |
(→Yea: add votes collected by User:Conservative) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Yea== | ==Yea== | ||
| + | *[[User:Conservative]] | ||
| + | *[[User:TerryH]] | ||
| + | *[[User:Karajou]] | ||
| + | *Mystery Sysop 1 | ||
| + | *Mystery Sysop 2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | (To make the vote count accurate, I'm adding some votes that have been cast [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAschlafly&action=historysubmit&diff=895426&oldid=895420 elsewhere]. I invite anyone I've listed to add a comment by their name. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 15:11, 31 July 2011 (EDT)) | ||
==Nay== | ==Nay== | ||
Revision as of 19:11, July 31, 2011
Yea
- User:Conservative
- User:TerryH
- User:Karajou
- Mystery Sysop 1
- Mystery Sysop 2
(To make the vote count accurate, I'm adding some votes that have been cast elsewhere. I invite anyone I've listed to add a comment by their name. --MarkGall 15:11, 31 July 2011 (EDT))
Nay
- I vote nay. RobS is trying to bring accountability to the site. There is something admirable in that, and it's a move in the right direction. —KBarnett 14:56, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
- RobS should keep his rights. If anything, Conservative should lose his. JonS 15:00, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
- Nay. I can't see a reason why RobS should lose his rights, especially when there are others who seem to actively be harming the site through their actions.--MRellek 15:03, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
- Obvious nay for obvious reasons. We need to put an end to arbitrary block times and the constant history deletion of pages (such as the Community Portal) at the very least. As long as the sysops have the right to do whatever they please (while subjecting regular users to rules that are much stricter than for example Wikipedia's policies), the community won't grow and will forever be a paradise for parodists. --Sid 3050 15:04, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
- I vote no. I haven't been around in quite some time, but I used to be a fairly active user (with block rights etc) and left in part because of some of the same issues RobS has addressed. I too believe these "reforms" are necessary for the site to move forward, and may return to active participation if something along these lines is enacted. --MarkGall 15:08, 31 July 2011 (EDT) (editing while traveling, please don't ban me for the IP change!) (PS: can some sysop fix the spelling of this page?)