Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings"
(→Email: new section) |
(→Email: Suggestion.) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I'm not really wanting to contribute to these proceedings, but there is one relevant issue which I've just mentioned to Aschlafly. When users are blocked, they see a screen suggesting they email the user that blocked them. If it's agreed that that won't be policy, the screen ought to be amended accordingly.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT) | I'm not really wanting to contribute to these proceedings, but there is one relevant issue which I've just mentioned to Aschlafly. When users are blocked, they see a screen suggesting they email the user that blocked them. If it's agreed that that won't be policy, the screen ought to be amended accordingly.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgBlockAllowsUTEdit – Would enabling blocked users to appeal via their talk page be acceptable? Finding the Email of a sysop was an issue I had when I attempted to appeal my block. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 21:39, 21 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:39, August 22, 2011
An unsolicited comment can be read here, for all who are interested. Since I'm not a sysop, I have no voice in the matter, but I at least hope that some of you will take a few minutes to consider my ideas about the block policies:
User:JDWpianist/JDW's_unsolicited_input_on_blocking_policy
JDWpianist 09:54, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
Why
Why is it that I am unable to serve on this panel? I put my name down earlier on a different page but have had it reverted here. I have already made headway on policy. What is the problem? MaxFletcher 17:24, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
- I didn't know you had blocking rights. My apologies. I am going to contact a few fellow Sysops and see if an exception will be made for people who have created a lot of original content. Personally, I think as a general principle, these people should be on the panel if they wish to be. Conservative 17:36, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
- Fine by me, cheers! MaxFletcher 17:38, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
- I didn't know you had blocking rights. My apologies. I am going to contact a few fellow Sysops and see if an exception will be made for people who have created a lot of original content. Personally, I think as a general principle, these people should be on the panel if they wish to be. Conservative 17:36, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
Scattered comments
In the last day or two, I have scattered some comments about blocking policy all over this wiki. I'd have to locate this and consolidate them. I don't have time to rewrite or condense them. (Hint: someone could just copy and paste, if there's anything there that looks good.) --Ed Poor Talk 17:10, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
I'm not really wanting to contribute to these proceedings, but there is one relevant issue which I've just mentioned to Aschlafly. When users are blocked, they see a screen suggesting they email the user that blocked them. If it's agreed that that won't be policy, the screen ought to be amended accordingly.--CPalmer 07:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
- http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgBlockAllowsUTEdit – Would enabling blocked users to appeal via their talk page be acceptable? Finding the Email of a sysop was an issue I had when I attempted to appeal my block. --Michaeldsuarez 21:39, 21 August 2011 (EDT)