Difference between revisions of "Talk:World History Study Guide to 1648"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Brahman/Brahmin: new section) |
(→Brahman/Brahmin: reply) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT) | Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:57, August 24, 2011
Marvelous work! But may I draw you attention to User talk:Aschlafly#Have you made a determination yet? --RonLar 18:30, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
Suggestions
Justinius I/the Justinian Code
Holy Roman Empire/Charlemagne
Origen (Perhaps an Honors term)
Sun Tzu
Niccolo Machiavelli
The Catholic Monarchs
--Benp 09:45, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Brahman/Brahmin
Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --SharonW 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
- They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--Andy Schlafly 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)