Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jim Cramer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added article talk header template) |
m (→OAI Updates: underperformed) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Articletalkheader}} | {{Articletalkheader}} | ||
| − | == | + | |
| − | I' | + | == Cramer is an entertainer == |
| + | ===Obama Accountability Index=== | ||
| + | He may be conservative, but he's not very credible. I recalculated his index and it comes in at 165.20 today. He dropped it because it refutes him. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?Symbol=MTLQQ&&ShowChtBt=Refresh+Chart&DateRangeForm=1&CP=0&PT=5&C9=0&ComparisonsForm=1&CE=0&DisplayForm=1&D4=1&D5=0&3=0&ViewType=0&PeriodType=5 data source] | ||
| + | <br>week of | ||
| + | <br>19-Jan 10-Nov stock code | ||
| + | <br>6.24 16.03 bac (Bank America) | ||
| + | <br>3.49 0.58 MTLQQ old GM | ||
| + | <br>24.28 44.17 jpm (JP Morgan) | ||
| + | <br>3.47 4.18 c (Citi) | ||
| + | <br>35.66 59.96 cat (Caterpiller) | ||
| + | <br>12.03 15.78 ge (GE) | ||
| + | <br>14.195 23.45 average | ||
| + | <br>100 165.20 index [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 00:24, 11 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Very helpful! Thank you for doing the calculations! Wow.. much appreciated. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 01:06, 11 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Updates. I did some calculations too. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 20:30, 11 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::{| align="left" | ||
| + | | colspan="3" align="left" | ''[http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^GSPC#chart1:symbol=^gspc;range=1y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined Data Source]'' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ||'''Stock ticker''' | ||
| + | ||'''Jan 21''' | ||
| + | ||'''Nov 10''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | BAC | ||
| + | | 6.68 | ||
| + | | 16.03 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | MTLQQ | ||
| + | | 3.52 | ||
| + | | 0.58 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | JPM | ||
| + | | 22.63 | ||
| + | | 44.17 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | C | ||
| + | | 3.67 | ||
| + | | 4.18 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | CAT | ||
| + | | 39.55 | ||
| + | | 59.96 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | GE | ||
| + | | 13.03 | ||
| + | | 15.78 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |''Average Price'': | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 14.846 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 23.45 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 58% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |''Index'': | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 100 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 158 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 58% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |S&P 500 price: | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 840.24 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 1,093.01 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 30% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::''From January 21 to November 10, 2009, the'' | ||
| + | ::''Obama Accountability Index increased '''18%''' '' | ||
| + | ::''over the S&P 500. Thus, according to the'' | ||
| + | ::''OAI, Obama is doing well.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Citation==== | ||
| + | I updated [[Jim Cramer|Jim Cramer's]] article with a citation pointing here, as a reference for how we calculated the [[Jim_Cramer#Obama_Accountability_Index|Obama Accountability Index]]. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 13:31, 25 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Updates (February 10, 2010). [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 15:40, 12 February 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::{| align="left" | ||
| + | | colspan="3" align="left" | ''[http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^GSPC#chart1:symbol=^gspc;range=1y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined Data Source]'' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ||'''Stock ticker''' | ||
| + | ||'''Jan 21, 2009''' | ||
| + | ||'''Feb 10, 2010''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | BAC | ||
| + | | 6.68 | ||
| + | | 14.67 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | MTLQQ | ||
| + | | 3.52 | ||
| + | | 0.59 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | JPM | ||
| + | | 22.63 | ||
| + | | 38.87 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | C | ||
| + | | 3.67 | ||
| + | | 3.20 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | CAT | ||
| + | | 39.55 | ||
| + | | 53.15 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | GE | ||
| + | | 13.03 | ||
| + | | 15.69 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |''Average Price'': | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 14.846 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 21.02 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 41.65% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |''Index'': | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 100 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 141.65 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 41.65% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |S&P 500 price: | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 840.24 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 1,068.13 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 27.2% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::''From January 21, 2009, to February 10, 2010, the'' | ||
| + | ::''Obama Accountability Index increased '''14.45%''' '' | ||
| + | ::''over the S&P 500. Thus, according to the'' | ||
| + | ::''OAI, Obama is doing well.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====OAI Underperformed==== | ||
| + | I updated the [[Jim_Cramer#Obama_Accountability_Index|Obama Accountability Index]], including adjusting the stock price for Citigroup (C) following their reverse stock split.[http://www.citigroup.com/citi/press/2011/110321a.htm] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Updates (August 22, 2011). [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 17:00, 6 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::{| align="left" | ||
| + | | colspan="3" align="left" | ''[http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^GSPC#chart1:symbol=^gspc;range=1y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined Data Source]'' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ||'''Stock ticker''' | ||
| + | ||'''Jan 21, 2009''' | ||
| + | ||'''Aug 22, 2011''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | BAC | ||
| + | | 6.68 | ||
| + | | 6.42 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | MTLQQ | ||
| + | | 3.52 | ||
| + | | 0.04 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | JPM | ||
| + | | 22.63 | ||
| + | | 33.41 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | C | ||
| + | | 36.70 <small>''[http://www.citigroup.com/citi/fin/split.htm Stock Split History]''</small> | ||
| + | | 26.06 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | CAT | ||
| + | | 39.55 | ||
| + | | 79.89 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | GE | ||
| + | | 13.03 | ||
| + | | 15.11 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |''Average Price'': | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 20.35 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 26.82 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 31.79% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |''Index'': | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 122.11 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 160.93 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 31.79% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |S&P 500 price: | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 840.24 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | 1,123.82 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | = 33.7% increase | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::''From January 21, 2009 to August 22, 2011 the'' | ||
| + | ::''Obama Accountability Index '''underperformed''' the'' | ||
| + | ::''S&P 500 Index by '''1.91%'''. Thus, according to the'' | ||
| + | ::''OAI, Obama is struggling to rejuvenate the economy.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
| + | <br /><br /> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:21, September 7, 2011
| This Talk Page is for Discussion Focused on the Improvement of the Corresponding Article | ||
|
Archives: None
| |
| For article guidelines please see the Commandments and Guidelines | ||
Cramer is an entertainer
Obama Accountability Index
He may be conservative, but he's not very credible. I recalculated his index and it comes in at 165.20 today. He dropped it because it refutes him.
data source
week of
19-Jan 10-Nov stock code
6.24 16.03 bac (Bank America)
3.49 0.58 MTLQQ old GM
24.28 44.17 jpm (JP Morgan)
3.47 4.18 c (Citi)
35.66 59.96 cat (Caterpiller)
12.03 15.78 ge (GE)
14.195 23.45 average
100 165.20 index RJJensen 00:24, 11 November 2009 (EST)
- Very helpful! Thank you for doing the calculations! Wow.. much appreciated. DerekE 01:06, 11 November 2009 (EST)
- Updates. I did some calculations too. DerekE 20:30, 11 November 2009 (EST)
Data Source Stock ticker Jan 21 Nov 10 BAC 6.68 16.03 MTLQQ 3.52 0.58 JPM 22.63 44.17 C 3.67 4.18 CAT 39.55 59.96 GE 13.03 15.78 Average Price: 14.846
23.45
= 58% increase
Index: 100
158
= 58% increase
S&P 500 price: 840.24
1,093.01
= 30% increase
- From January 21 to November 10, 2009, the
- Obama Accountability Index increased 18%
- over the S&P 500. Thus, according to the
- OAI, Obama is doing well.
Citation
I updated Jim Cramer's article with a citation pointing here, as a reference for how we calculated the Obama Accountability Index. DerekE 13:31, 25 November 2009 (EST)
- Updates (February 10, 2010). DerekE 15:40, 12 February 2010 (EST)
Data Source Stock ticker Jan 21, 2009 Feb 10, 2010 BAC 6.68 14.67 MTLQQ 3.52 0.59 JPM 22.63 38.87 C 3.67 3.20 CAT 39.55 53.15 GE 13.03 15.69 Average Price: 14.846
21.02
= 41.65% increase
Index: 100
141.65
= 41.65% increase
S&P 500 price: 840.24
1,068.13
= 27.2% increase
- From January 21, 2009, to February 10, 2010, the
- Obama Accountability Index increased 14.45%
- over the S&P 500. Thus, according to the
- OAI, Obama is doing well.
OAI Underperformed
I updated the Obama Accountability Index, including adjusting the stock price for Citigroup (C) following their reverse stock split.[1]
- Updates (August 22, 2011). DerekE 17:00, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
Data Source Stock ticker Jan 21, 2009 Aug 22, 2011 BAC 6.68 6.42 MTLQQ 3.52 0.04 JPM 22.63 33.41 C 36.70 Stock Split History 26.06 CAT 39.55 79.89 GE 13.03 15.11 Average Price: 20.35
26.82
= 31.79% increase
Index: 122.11
160.93
= 31.79% increase
S&P 500 price: 840.24
1,123.82
= 33.7% increase
- From January 21, 2009 to August 22, 2011 the
- Obama Accountability Index underperformed the
- S&P 500 Index by 1.91%. Thus, according to the
- OAI, Obama is struggling to rejuvenate the economy.