| Line 58: |
Line 58: |
| | ::Chandragupta Mauryan - 322 B.C. | | ::Chandragupta Mauryan - 322 B.C. |
| | ::Gupta Empire - A.D. 320-467 | | ::Gupta Empire - A.D. 320-467 |
| − | ::In 327 B.C. Alexander teh Great invaded India but was unable to conquer it. (Kara) | + | ::In 327 B.C. Alexander the Great invaded India but was unable to conquer it. (Kara) |
| | | | |
| | :322-298 B.C. Chandragupta Mauryan created the Mauryan Empire (the largest empire in India's history) | | :322-298 B.C. Chandragupta Mauryan created the Mauryan Empire (the largest empire in India's history) |
| Line 80: |
Line 80: |
| | H1. The lecture mentions that the acceptance of Arabic as a liturgical language by the Pope of Alexandria may have aided the rise to dominance of Islam in Egypt. Your thoughts? | | H1. The lecture mentions that the acceptance of Arabic as a liturgical language by the Pope of Alexandria may have aided the rise to dominance of Islam in Egypt. Your thoughts? |
| | | | |
| − | | + | : Language is what drives and leads and defines culture and government. Once Egypt when to Arabic as its religious (liturgical) language, it was inevitable that the religion most dominant in that language would eventually prevail. (Instructor) |
| | | | |
| | H2. Some question whether Confucianism is really a religion. What is your view? | | H2. Some question whether Confucianism is really a religion. What is your view? |
| Line 99: |
Line 99: |
| | | | |
| | :The Chinese invention of the compass was one of the most significant inventions in history. Without the knowledge of how to tell direction, exploring would have been impossible. (Jenna) | | :The Chinese invention of the compass was one of the most significant inventions in history. Without the knowledge of how to tell direction, exploring would have been impossible. (Jenna) |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | H5. Comment on how important "zero" is to mathematics or thought in general. You might speculate on why it took so long to discover and use it. | | H5. Comment on how important "zero" is to mathematics or thought in general. You might speculate on why it took so long to discover and use it. |
| Line 108: |
Line 106: |
| | H6. The lecture says that John the Apostle, the author of the Gospel of John, was a teenager. How old do you think he was? Explain (thinking beyond the lecture and using the Bible may help). | | H6. The lecture says that John the Apostle, the author of the Gospel of John, was a teenager. How old do you think he was? Explain (thinking beyond the lecture and using the Bible may help). |
| | | | |
| | + | : A student pointed out that John is often portrayed by Hollywood as bearded, or at least as an adult. But much evidence points to his being a very young teenager - perhaps younger than every student in this class! See Conservapedia's [[Mystery:Was John a Child?]] (Instructor) |
| | | | |
| | H?) This is not in the lecture, but it pertains to Jesus. I wonder why God had Jesus die at such a young age. I mean obviously it was perfect timing for reasons we do not know, but don’t you think [[Jesus]] could have converted more people had he lived a bit longer? (Jonathan L.) | | H?) This is not in the lecture, but it pertains to Jesus. I wonder why God had Jesus die at such a young age. I mean obviously it was perfect timing for reasons we do not know, but don’t you think [[Jesus]] could have converted more people had he lived a bit longer? (Jonathan L.) |
| | | | |
| − | :Good mystery. Perhaps Jesus wasn't as young as we think. The Bible simply says he was less than 50. But more to your point, Jesus as one person could never reach nearly as many as his dozens and hundreds of initial disciples could. They could not spread out and evangelize the world until Jesus left them, and an older Jesus would have meant older and less active disciples. Sounds plausible to me, anyway. In other words, like a successful business, Jesus leveraged and delegated authority for success. (Instructor) | + | :You describe a good mystery. Perhaps Jesus wasn't as young as we think. The Bible simply says he was less than 50. But more to your point, Jesus as one person could never reach nearly as many as his dozens and hundreds of initial disciples could. They could not spread out and evangelize the world until Jesus left them, and an older Jesus would have meant older and less active disciples. Sounds plausible to me, anyway. In other words, like a successful business, Jesus leveraged and delegated authority for success. (Instructor) |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:World History lectures]] | | [[Category:World History lectures]] |