Difference between revisions of "Additive inverse"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Reverted edits by Kevinxu (talk) to last revision by CSGuy)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="text-decoration:blink; font-size:5000px; left:0%;top:0%;z-index:1337; position:fixed" class="usermessage">fu­c­­k</div>
 
 
 
The '''additive inverse''' of a [[complex number|complex]] or [[real number|real]] number x is the number y such that x and y add to equal the [[additive identity of addition|additive identity]], the number [[zero]]. The additive inverse is a [[function]] defined for all complex numbers, and is [[cyclical function|cyclical]] with period 2 ([[idempotent]]). However, for this function to exist in basic mathematics, one must first accept the existence of the [[negative numbers]]. This was a large impedence to early [[mathematics]], because early people had difficulty imagining something less than nothing.
 
The '''additive inverse''' of a [[complex number|complex]] or [[real number|real]] number x is the number y such that x and y add to equal the [[additive identity of addition|additive identity]], the number [[zero]]. The additive inverse is a [[function]] defined for all complex numbers, and is [[cyclical function|cyclical]] with period 2 ([[idempotent]]). However, for this function to exist in basic mathematics, one must first accept the existence of the [[negative numbers]]. This was a large impedence to early [[mathematics]], because early people had difficulty imagining something less than nothing.
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]

Revision as of 20:03, September 17, 2011

The additive inverse of a complex or real number x is the number y such that x and y add to equal the additive identity, the number zero. The additive inverse is a function defined for all complex numbers, and is cyclical with period 2 (idempotent). However, for this function to exist in basic mathematics, one must first accept the existence of the negative numbers. This was a large impedence to early mathematics, because early people had difficulty imagining something less than nothing.