Difference between revisions of "Talk:United Nations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(typo) |
Stevendavy (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::I heard somewhere the UN serves 102 million meals daily; so there is an arguement to keep some of the alleged functions it performs going. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:03, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ::I heard somewhere the UN serves 102 million meals daily; so there is an arguement to keep some of the alleged functions it performs going. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:03, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Heavy political bias in this article. To say that Israel has been singled out is highly questionable and to state it as fact is intelletually indefencible. [[User:Stevendavy|Stevendavy]] | ||
Revision as of 21:48, April 7, 2007
Hold it! This may be conservapedia but even so we should mention at least some poisitve actions of the UN or its associated agencies. The W.H.O did eradicate smallpox afterall.
- Good for you. Please do add that statement. Haha, I almost got banned for posting on the ACLU page about how the ACLU fought racism. Good times ;-). But DO add your words.-AmesG 20:59, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- I heard somewhere the UN serves 102 million meals daily; so there is an arguement to keep some of the alleged functions it performs going. RobS 21:03, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
Heavy political bias in this article. To say that Israel has been singled out is highly questionable and to state it as fact is intelletually indefencible. Stevendavy