Difference between revisions of "Talk:Richard Dawkins' Elevatorgate comments"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
While the notability of the 'elevatorgate' incident is questionable enough, there is certainly no need to go making an entirely separate article about the comments made by Richard Dawkins about it. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 21:37, 24 September 2011 (EDT) | While the notability of the 'elevatorgate' incident is questionable enough, there is certainly no need to go making an entirely separate article about the comments made by Richard Dawkins about it. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 21:37, 24 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:46, 24 September 2011 (EDT) | + | :::Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins? Could this be influencing your decision to not want Dawkins remarks highlighted? Skeptic [[David Allen Green]] is of the opinion that the Elevatorgate scandal was notable. Plus, it was covered by some major press outlets. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:46, 24 September 2011 (EDT) |
Revision as of 01:48, September 25, 2011
While the notability of the 'elevatorgate' incident is questionable enough, there is certainly no need to go making an entirely separate article about the comments made by Richard Dawkins about it. DavidZa 21:37, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
- Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins? Could this be influencing your decision to not want Dawkins remarks highlighted? Skeptic David Allen Green is of the opinion that the Elevatorgate scandal was notable. Plus, it was covered by some major press outlets. Conservative 21:46, 24 September 2011 (EDT)