Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skeptic Skatje Myers' comments on bestiality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(prominence or not. I don't see the point.) |
(presume not) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:::::FYI, you can link to a section of an article using the hash (#) character, eg [[Atheism_and_bestiality#Skeptic_Skatje_Myers.27_comments_on_bestiality|this link]] would obviate the need for this content to be a separate article.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 08:36, 23 September 2011 (EDT) | :::::FYI, you can link to a section of an article using the hash (#) character, eg [[Atheism_and_bestiality#Skeptic_Skatje_Myers.27_comments_on_bestiality|this link]] would obviate the need for this content to be a separate article.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 08:36, 23 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::::So, it's all about getting Pageviews, right? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 08:58, 23 September 2011 (EDT) | ::::::So, it's all about getting Pageviews, right? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 08:58, 23 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::::::I presume not. The page has only been viewed 57 times, which is rather modest.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:20, 26 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:20, September 26, 2011
You made a link to this page from Atheism and bestiality as if there was going to be more information. I see nothing different here. Just a byte-by-byte copy of what was on the original article. The kicker is that no one without proper rights is allowed to put {{merge}} or {{db}}. ~ JonG ~ 02:22, 23 September 2011 (EDT)
- It allows for the main atheism article to cite it via a link. PZ Myers is one of the most prominent atheist in the Western atheist community and the link gives additional information in the main atheism article. Conservative 03:50, 23 September 2011 (EDT)