Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(second example: Newt as the most likely to win presidential nomination) |
m |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Sept. 19. 2010 | |Sept. 19. 2010 | ||
| − | |[[Newt Gingrich]] is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=819261</ref> | + | |[[Newt Gingrich]] is the most [[Presidential Election 2012|likely to win the Republican nomination for President]]<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=819261</ref> |
|[[Mitt Romney]] is the presumptive nominee | |[[Mitt Romney]] is the presumptive nominee | ||
|Newt leads in national polls and severawl key primary states | |Newt leads in national polls and severawl key primary states | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 00:26, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:
| Date | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | the basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment | November 2011 |
| Sept. 19. 2010 | Newt Gingrich is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President[1] | Mitt Romney is the presumptive nominee | Newt leads in national polls and severawl key primary states | November 2011 |