Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|Sept. 19. 2010 | |Sept. 19. 2010 | ||
|[[Newt Gingrich]] is the most [[Presidential Election 2012|likely to win the Republican nomination for President]]<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=819261</ref> | |[[Newt Gingrich]] is the most [[Presidential Election 2012|likely to win the Republican nomination for President]]<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=819261</ref> | ||
| − | |[[Mitt Romney]] | + | |Liberals, preferring [[Mitt Romney]], declare him to be the presumptive nominee |
| − | |Newt leads in national polls and | + | |Newt leads in national polls and several key primary states |
|November 2011 | |November 2011 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 00:28, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:
| Date | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | the basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment | November 2011 |
| Sept. 19. 2010 | Newt Gingrich is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President[1] | Liberals, preferring Mitt Romney, declare him to be the presumptive nominee | Newt leads in national polls and several key primary states | November 2011 |