Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(third example: Christie endorsing Romney for president) |
m |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|July 2, 2011 | |July 2, 2011 | ||
| − | |[[Chris Christie]] | + | |[[Chris Christie]] will endorse [[Mitt Romney]] for president |
|[[Lamestream media]] insisted that Christie was a contender himself | |[[Lamestream media]] insisted that Christie was a contender himself | ||
|Chris Christie endorses Mitt Romney for president | |Chris Christie endorses Mitt Romney for president | ||
Revision as of 00:42, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:
| Date | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | Clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | The basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment. | November 2011 |
| Sept. 19. 2010 | Newt Gingrich is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President[1] | Liberals, preferring Mitt Romney, declare him to be the presumptive nominee | Newt leads in national polls and several key primary states | November 2011 |
| July 2, 2011 | Chris Christie will endorse Mitt Romney for president | Lamestream media insisted that Christie was a contender himself | Chris Christie endorses Mitt Romney for president | Oct. 11, 2011 |