Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (cat)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
!Result
 
!Result
 
!Date of Result
 
!Date of Result
 +
|-
 +
|Dec. 22, 2008
 +
|the theory of man-made [[global warming]] is not verified science, and there is no consensus<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227</ref>
 +
|"the science is settled" that rapid global warming is somehow occurring
 +
|frigid temperatures and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "climate change"
 +
|2011
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Nov. 28, 2009
 
|Nov. 28, 2009

Revision as of 01:13, November 20, 2011

Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:

Date Conservapedia statement liberal claptrap Result Date of Result
Dec. 22, 2008 the theory of man-made global warming is not verified science, and there is no consensus[1] "the science is settled" that rapid global warming is somehow occurring frigid temperatures and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "climate change" 2011
Nov. 28, 2009 Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" Clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples The basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment. November 2011
Sept. 19. 2010 Newt Gingrich is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President[2] Liberals, preferring Mitt Romney, declare him to be the presumptive nominee Newt leads in national polls and several key primary states November 2011
July 2, 2011 Chris Christie will endorse Mitt Romney for president Lamestream media insisted that Christie was a contender himself Chris Christie endorses Mitt Romney for president Oct. 11, 2011

References