Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jack Kemp"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Pathetic errors in article. There's just no excuse for this kind of ignorance.)
 
(reply)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==17 year expansion?==
 
==17 year expansion?==
 
There was no 17 year expansion. The economy was tipped into recession in 1982 by the economic actions of the new administration(Their 'push-pull' hypothesis); and as Dave Stockman explains in his autobiography, the recession would have been much worse if Kemp and the gold-bugs had had their way. Furthermore, there was another major recession during the George HW Bush administration, less than a decade after that of '82.[[User:Keysersoze|Keysersoze]] 21:15, 29 November 2011 (EST)
 
There was no 17 year expansion. The economy was tipped into recession in 1982 by the economic actions of the new administration(Their 'push-pull' hypothesis); and as Dave Stockman explains in his autobiography, the recession would have been much worse if Kemp and the gold-bugs had had their way. Furthermore, there was another major recession during the George HW Bush administration, less than a decade after that of '82.[[User:Keysersoze|Keysersoze]] 21:15, 29 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
:I find both comments above to be nitpicky, but please feel free to make any corrections to the entry that you think best.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:41, 29 November 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 02:41, November 30, 2011

30%?

The tax bill in question did not produce a tax cut of 30%. It was a 23% tax-cut. (The original 10-10-10 proposal was diluted to 10-8-5).Keysersoze 21:15, 29 November 2011 (EST)

17 year expansion?

There was no 17 year expansion. The economy was tipped into recession in 1982 by the economic actions of the new administration(Their 'push-pull' hypothesis); and as Dave Stockman explains in his autobiography, the recession would have been much worse if Kemp and the gold-bugs had had their way. Furthermore, there was another major recession during the George HW Bush administration, less than a decade after that of '82.Keysersoze 21:15, 29 November 2011 (EST)

I find both comments above to be nitpicky, but please feel free to make any corrections to the entry that you think best.--Andy Schlafly 21:41, 29 November 2011 (EST)