Difference between revisions of "Tax cuts"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (The Laffer Curve: Past, Present, and Future)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Laffer wrote:
 
Laffer wrote:
* Because tax cuts create an [[incentive]] to increase output, [[employment]], and [[production]], they also help [[balance the budget]] by reducing means-tested [[government expenditures]]. A faster-growing economy means lower [[unemployment]] and higher [[income]]s, resulting in reduced [[unemployment benefits]] and other social [[welfare programs]]. [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2004/06/The-Laffer-Curve-Past-Present-and-Future]
+
* Because tax cuts create an [[incentive]] to increase output, [[employment]], and [[production]], they also help [[balance the budget]] by reducing means-tested [[government expenditures]]. A faster-growing economy means lower [[unemployment]] and higher [[income]]s, resulting in reduced [[unemployment benefits]] and other social [[welfare programs]]. [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2004/06/The-Laffer-Curve-Past-Present-and-Future The Laffer Curve: Past, Present, and Future] - Arthur Laffer - June 1, 2004
 +
 
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references />
  
 
See also:
 
See also:

Revision as of 15:31, December 17, 2011

Tax cuts give incentives to work, save, and invest, thus creating jobs and increasing economic growth. [1] They provide a stimulus to the economy, because they reduce the cost of doing business and allow ordinary citizens to spend or save or invest more of their own money.

Often cutting a tax rate will result in a net increase of tax revenue. This may seem paradoxical but can be easily explained by the fact that lowering taxes can stimulate the economy. The best example is the tax on capital gains. This phenomenon is described by the Laffer curve, which states there exists a point when increasing taxes actually decreases tax revenue.

Laffer wrote:

Notes


See also: