Difference between revisions of "Talk:United States Presidential Race - Endorsements for Republicans 2012"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
(→Many wondered why this ambassador for the Obama Administration was running for the Republican nomination.: Soldiers are not political appointees. Ambassadors are.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
He was not an ambassador for the Obama Administration, he was an ambassador for the United States of America. Would a soldier serving today be a soldier for the Obama Administration, too? [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 00:07, 16 January 2012 (EST) | He was not an ambassador for the Obama Administration, he was an ambassador for the United States of America. Would a soldier serving today be a soldier for the Obama Administration, too? [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 00:07, 16 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Soldiers are not political appointees. Ambassadors are.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:18, 16 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:18, January 16, 2012
John Bolton's endorsement ...
Another for Romney. ScottDG 18:45, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- Good catch. You can include it in the entry, with a priority rank that you think is appropriate.--Andy Schlafly 19:01, 12 January 2012 (EST)
Many wondered why this ambassador for the Obama Administration was running for the Republican nomination.
He was not an ambassador for the Obama Administration, he was an ambassador for the United States of America. Would a soldier serving today be a soldier for the Obama Administration, too? ScottDG 00:07, 16 January 2012 (EST)
- Soldiers are not political appointees. Ambassadors are.--Andy Schlafly 00:18, 16 January 2012 (EST)