Difference between revisions of "Stop Online Piracy Act"
(mention Smith first as introducer of bill, Reid more relevant for PIPA though I'm not clear on the relationship between the two) |
(Obama Administration statement on SOPA) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Those supporting the bill include [[television]] and [[music]] companies (and their trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America), whilst critics include [[Google]], [[Facebook]], [[Twitter]], [[Wikipedia]], Yahoo!, and Mozilla, the creators of [[Firefox]]. | Those supporting the bill include [[television]] and [[music]] companies (and their trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America), whilst critics include [[Google]], [[Facebook]], [[Twitter]], [[Wikipedia]], Yahoo!, and Mozilla, the creators of [[Firefox]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[Obama Administration]] released a statement which read, in part, "we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet. Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small. <ref>[http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/14/obama-administration-responds-we-people-petitions-sopa-and-online-piracy]</ref> | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Copyright]] | [[Category:Copyright]] | ||
[[Category:Internet]] | [[Category:Internet]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 01:30, January 18, 2012
The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) (also known as House Bill 3261 or H.R. 3261) is a bill which was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on October 26, 2011, by House Judiciary Committee Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) which would impose a number of controversial measures for dealing with online piracy including the distribution of copyrighted material via the internet. If passed, this bill would give the United States law enforcement and copyright holders greater control to fight Internet piracy (copyright infringement). The Attorney General would be able to close down websites that infringe copyrights, and ban the site from online payment mechanisms such as PayPal and Visa. He could also prohibit the sites' online advertising, and disable Google from ranking and linking to infringing sites.
It is supported by liberal Senator Harry Reid (D-NV).
Proponents of the bill claim that it exists to protect the intellectual properties, and revenue of copyright holders, and is necessary to enforce copyright laws in the US. However, opponents state that it violates the First Amendment, that it will cripple and ultimately destroy the internet, and will threaten online free speech. Some critics have likened this bill to China's Great Firewall.
Those supporting the bill include television and music companies (and their trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America), whilst critics include Google, Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, and Mozilla, the creators of Firefox.
The Obama Administration released a statement which read, in part, "we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet. Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small. [1]