Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and rape"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg [[User:SterlingMaloryArcher|SterlingMaloryArcher]] 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST) | Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg [[User:SterlingMaloryArcher|SterlingMaloryArcher]] 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| − | ::Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post [[Dan Barker]]'s statements? Where is the negative reporting of Barker on this [http://www.freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Dan_Barker atheist/skeptic wiki] ?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST) | + | ::Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post [[Dan Barker]]'s statements? Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this [http://www.freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Dan_Barker atheist/skeptic wiki] ?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST) |
Revision as of 02:20, February 17, 2012
Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg SterlingMaloryArcher 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST)
- Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post Dan Barker's statements? Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this atheist/skeptic wiki ?Conservative 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)