Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and rape"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg [[User:SterlingMaloryArcher|SterlingMaloryArcher]] 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST)
 
Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg [[User:SterlingMaloryArcher|SterlingMaloryArcher]] 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST)
−
::Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post [[Dan Barker]]'s statements? Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this [http://www.freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Dan_Barker atheist/skeptic wiki] ?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)
+
::Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post [[Dan Barker]]'s statements? Why is there not a single piece of negative information on Dan Barker's [[Wikipedia]] page?[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Barker]  Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this [http://www.freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Dan_Barker atheist/skeptic wiki]?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 02:30, February 17, 2012

Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg SterlingMaloryArcher 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST)

Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post Dan Barker's statements? Why is there not a single piece of negative information on Dan Barker's Wikipedia page?[1] Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this atheist/skeptic wiki?Conservative 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)