Difference between revisions of "Curiosity"
From Conservapedia
(Undo revision 902785 by Fontecedro (talk)) |
m (better cat) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Brian Lowry of ''Variety'' wrote: | Brian Lowry of ''Variety'' wrote: | ||
* As a scientist, Hawking concludes, it's completely valid to question "whether we need a God to explain the universe at all," proceeding to methodically lay out the case for the Big Bang Theory (and what could create something out of nothingness) and natural laws that don't require a spiritual component. [http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945762] | * As a scientist, Hawking concludes, it's completely valid to question "whether we need a God to explain the universe at all," proceeding to methodically lay out the case for the Big Bang Theory (and what could create something out of nothingness) and natural laws that don't require a spiritual component. [http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945762] | ||
| − | [[Category:Television | + | [[Category:Television Shows]] |
Latest revision as of 13:28, April 25, 2012
Curiosity is a Discovery Channel show which addresses fundamantal questions in science and philosophy. Its publicity campaign implies that it intends to take an objective approach, but whether it includes any religious perspective remains to be seen. The show highlights the views of a popular physicist who believes God to be unnecessary to the universe. [1]
Brian Lowry of Variety wrote:
- As a scientist, Hawking concludes, it's completely valid to question "whether we need a God to explain the universe at all," proceeding to methodically lay out the case for the Big Bang Theory (and what could create something out of nothingness) and natural laws that don't require a spiritual component. [2]
