Difference between revisions of "Creationist contributions to science"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Creationist contributions to science''' include the biological work of [[Linnaeus]] (classification system), [[Pasteur]] (germ theory), and [[Mendel]] (genetics). Young-earth creationists who contributed to astronomy include [[Copernicus]], [[Kepler]], [[Galileo]] and [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]. Continental drift was first proposed in 1859 by the French geographer and creationist [[Antonio Snider-Pellegrini]]. | '''Creationist contributions to science''' include the biological work of [[Linnaeus]] (classification system), [[Pasteur]] (germ theory), and [[Mendel]] (genetics). Young-earth creationists who contributed to astronomy include [[Copernicus]], [[Kepler]], [[Galileo]] and [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]. Continental drift was first proposed in 1859 by the French geographer and creationist [[Antonio Snider-Pellegrini]]. | ||
| − | + | == Creation science contrasted with evolutionary pseudoscience == | |
| + | |||
| + | Unlike [[evolution]]ists, [[Creation science|creation scientists]] have a satisfactory overall model when it comes [[origins science]]. The evolutionary [[paradigm]] is rife with [[pseudoscience]], deception, contradictory notions, doubletalk, empty promises, [[Atheism|atheistic]] wishful thinking and hoaxes (see: [[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality]]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | In addition, [[evolutionism]] is often promoted by liberal cowards (see: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]]). | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 01:26, June 24, 2012
Creationist contributions to science include the biological work of Linnaeus (classification system), Pasteur (germ theory), and Mendel (genetics). Young-earth creationists who contributed to astronomy include Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo and Newton. Continental drift was first proposed in 1859 by the French geographer and creationist Antonio Snider-Pellegrini.
Creation science contrasted with evolutionary pseudoscience
Unlike evolutionists, creation scientists have a satisfactory overall model when it comes origins science. The evolutionary paradigm is rife with pseudoscience, deception, contradictory notions, doubletalk, empty promises, atheistic wishful thinking and hoaxes (see: Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality).
In addition, evolutionism is often promoted by liberal cowards (see: Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates and Atheism and cowardice).