Difference between revisions of "Predicting ObamaCare Outcome"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge. Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else?) |
(Best of the Public / Obama rude) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*ObamaCare does violate the limits in the [[Commerce Clause]], and it is difficult to overcome that [[logic]] | *ObamaCare does violate the limits in the [[Commerce Clause]], and it is difficult to overcome that [[logic]] | ||
*while 85% of experts think ObamaCare will be upheld, probably 90% are unwilling to criticize [[Obama]], so when adjusted for bias it indicates disbelief that ObamaCare will be upheld | *while 85% of experts think ObamaCare will be upheld, probably 90% are unwilling to criticize [[Obama]], so when adjusted for bias it indicates disbelief that ObamaCare will be upheld | ||
| + | *So-called experts rarely live up to the expertise provided by the [[Best of the Public]], who tend to think the individual mandate will be overturned. | ||
| + | *[[Barack Obama]]'s [http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/3/obamas-faulty-grasp-of-our-constitution/ recent rudeness] to the Supreme Court may lead some of the more [[liberal]] justices, such as [[Anthony Kennedy]], to turn towards logic and truth over politics. | ||
*95% of those same experts deny that logic/[[conservatism]] advances over time for the same reason technology does | *95% of those same experts deny that logic/[[conservatism]] advances over time for the same reason technology does | ||
*ObamaCare could have been upheld more easily and quickly than to invalidate it | *ObamaCare could have been upheld more easily and quickly than to invalidate it | ||
*virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]]. Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else? | *virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]]. Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else? | ||
Revision as of 03:17, June 28, 2012
What is the best prediction of the outcome in the ObamaCare decision expected to be issued Thursday, June 27, 2012? 85% of experts predict that ObamaCare will be upheld - can so many experts be so wrong?
Yes, the experts are wrong, and here's why:
- ObamaCare does violate the limits in the Commerce Clause, and it is difficult to overcome that logic
- while 85% of experts think ObamaCare will be upheld, probably 90% are unwilling to criticize Obama, so when adjusted for bias it indicates disbelief that ObamaCare will be upheld
- So-called experts rarely live up to the expertise provided by the Best of the Public, who tend to think the individual mandate will be overturned.
- Barack Obama's recent rudeness to the Supreme Court may lead some of the more liberal justices, such as Anthony Kennedy, to turn towards logic and truth over politics.
- 95% of those same experts deny that logic/conservatism advances over time for the same reason technology does
- ObamaCare could have been upheld more easily and quickly than to invalidate it
- virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge. Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else?