Difference between revisions of "Talk:Predicting ObamaCare Outcome"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→So the experts were right?: Seriously, still making predictions?) |
(→So the experts were right?: The experts were wrong - they predicted the law would be upheld under the Commerce Clause, and ''Conservapedia'' was right in expecting otherwise. But Conservaped) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Maybe we shouldn't completely dismiss the opinion of people with training and experience? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 01:57, 1 July 2012 (EDT) | Maybe we shouldn't completely dismiss the opinion of people with training and experience? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 01:57, 1 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
: Now I see in main page predictions that nations that are atheistic and accept same sex marriage will fare badly in the Olympics. Absolutely nothing learned from this. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 14:20, 1 July 2012 (EDT) | : Now I see in main page predictions that nations that are atheistic and accept same sex marriage will fare badly in the Olympics. Absolutely nothing learned from this. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 14:20, 1 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The experts were wrong - they predicted the law would be upheld under the [[Commerce Clause]], and ''Conservapedia'' was right in expecting otherwise. But Conservapedia does not claim to be right in every one of its predictions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:38, 1 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:38, July 1, 2012
One question
Which key part(s) of the bill do you predict will be struck down and which, if any, will be upheld? As I understand (from a foreign perspective) there are several elements to consider, so which are the critical ones on which your prediction is based?
Oh well, never mind
Something to learn from this: making predictions is stupid. CasparRH 10:18, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
So the experts were right?
Maybe we shouldn't completely dismiss the opinion of people with training and experience? --MatthewQ 01:57, 1 July 2012 (EDT)
- Now I see in main page predictions that nations that are atheistic and accept same sex marriage will fare badly in the Olympics. Absolutely nothing learned from this. --MatthewQ 14:20, 1 July 2012 (EDT)
- The experts were wrong - they predicted the law would be upheld under the Commerce Clause, and Conservapedia was right in expecting otherwise. But Conservapedia does not claim to be right in every one of its predictions.--Andy Schlafly 14:38, 1 July 2012 (EDT)