Changes

*Interruption - intentionally interrupting an interviewee with a new question to cut the interviewee off from completely answering the previous question to throw the interviewee off-track.  This can make someone look bad if the first part of their answer demands an explanation or elaboration.

*Interruption - intentionally interrupting an interviewee with a new question to cut the interviewee off from completely answering the previous question to throw the interviewee off-track.  This can make someone look bad if the first part of their answer demands an explanation or elaboration.

*[[Bias]]ed [[photo]]s - wherein a media outlet will use images that denigrate a political figure.  Most common on media [[website]]s, but also in some [[newspaper]]s.  The photos are usually intended to make the target appear either incompetent or sinister.

*[[Bias]]ed [[photo]]s - wherein a media outlet will use images that denigrate a political figure.  Most common on media [[website]]s, but also in some [[newspaper]]s.  The photos are usually intended to make the target appear either incompetent or sinister.

*Name calling in the crude form of [[argumentum ad hominem]].

*Name calling in the crude form of [[argumentum ad hominem]] (such as calling opponents of liberal-favored agendas or [[sacred cow]]s "conspiracy theorists" or "[insert word here] deniers").

''(add more)''

''(add more)''

Liberals, as well as Communists, have been known to claim that something they oppose is "discredited" based merely on their say-so, either with nothing to back up their claims or with fabricated "evidence" which they claim supports their claims of "discreditation".

Liberals, as well as Communists, have been known to claim that something they oppose is "discredited" or "debunked" based merely on their say-so, either with nothing to back up their claims or with fabricated "evidence" which they claim supports their claims of "discreditation".

==See also==

==See also==