User talk:Northwest

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Re: Our past email correspondence

I enjoyed our past email correspondence. I do have a small request. I neglected to save your email address. Can you please send me another email?

And best wishes for the holidays. 07:41, December 23, 2023 (EST)

Please...

...show some respect for our contributors. [1] if an edit requires more context, ask the editor for more context, or do it yourself. Karajou don't run the show no more and apeing his technique won't work. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 10:48, December 27, 2023 (EST)

Thank you

Thank you for your superb unblocking work this morning.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 15:29, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Message regarding editing and you

Thank User:Karajou. He wrote this text:

In addition to the following Conservapedia Commandments, I expect several things from you.

  • The first is that you will respect this website. That order suggestion is non-negotiable.
  • Second, respect the people here.
  • Third, do the research when you write an article. I’ll have more respect for you if you hit the books and do a detailed article then if you simply put in one or two sentences with a link to a silly website that you insist is a source.
  • Fourth, if you need help, ask.
  • Fifth, don’t troll, don’t vandalize, don’t engage in edit wars, don’t pick fights, and don’t engage in endless debating on article talk pages if it has nothing to do with improving an article. I can and I will put an end to any of it.
  • Sixth, if you do debate, restrict it to a debate page set up for that purpose and keep it civil.

RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 16:48, January 5, 2024 (EST)

My fellow American. I believe that we will win! USA! USA! USA!

NorthWest,

A quick update:

Have a great day! Conservative (talk) 03:28, April 11, 2024 (EDT)

Do you agree with my analysis of Mike Johnson?

NorthWest, do you agree with my analysis of Mike Johnson given HERE?

Let me know what you think. Conservative (talk) 08:17, April 20, 2024 (EDT)

ummm, it's NorthwWest, not Peter. User:Conservative pays no attention to whom he spams his cut n paste spam to. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 21:08, April 20, 2024 (EDT)

See my newest Essay

NYT: Can the Right Confront Antisemitism in Its Ranks?

User:Conservative turned Conservapedia into a neo-Nazi fascist and antisemitic mouthpiece.
RobSRecovering Republican 11:21, December 18, 2025 (EST)
Why is it that many American conservatives don't believe in the concept of hate crimes?
Summary: "Many American conservatives oppose hate crime laws primarily because they view them as violating principles of equal justice under the law, punishing thought or motive rather than action alone, risking inconsistent or politicized enforcement, and potentially infringing on free speech—preferring instead that all violent crimes be prosecuted equally regardless of bias motivation."
I trust this clarifies matters. Conservative (talk) 11:42, December 18, 2025 (EST)

An extra 50,000–300,000 Russian casualties (killed and wounded combined) per year if User: Conservative does conversion rate optimization for Ukraine's drone fundraising websites

Question: Will RobSmith keep pestering User: Conservative and gossiping about him? If so, what are the likely consequences?

ChatGPT and Grok indicate:

Summary: "If major Ukraine-focused fundraising platforms improved their conversion rate optimization at scale, realistic estimates suggest an extra ~$80–$430 million in donations per year could be generated. At typical frontline drone costs (≈ $500 per unit), that additional funding could translate into roughly 160,000 to 860,000 extra low-cost drones per year, assuming funds were directed primarily toward drone procurement."

Grok said regarding: "ChatGPT said: "If major Ukraine-focused fundraising platforms improved their conversion rate optimization at scale, realistic estimates suggest an extra ~$80–$430 million in donations per year could be generated. At typical frontline drone costs (≈ $500 per unit), that additional funding could translate into roughly 160,000 to 860,000 extra low-cost drones per year, assuming funds were directed primarily toward drone procurement." Do you concur?"

Summary statement: "Based on public data from Ukrainian military reports, Western analyses, and drone unit statistics as of late 2025, the additional 250,000–750,000 low-cost FPV drones could realistically cause an estimated 50,000–300,000 Russian casualties (killed and wounded combined) per year, assuming typical deployment patterns, hit rates (20–50% success per drone due to electronic warfare and other factors), and average effectiveness (0.2–0.4 casualties per drone, often targeting infantry or small vehicles with 1–2 impacts per successful strike).

This range accounts for variability: lower-end assumes conservative hit rates and partial allocation to non-lethal roles (e.g., reconnaissance); higher-end reflects optimized use in high-intensity sectors like Pokrovsk or Donetsk, where elite units like the "Birds of Magyar" have achieved ~0.4–0.5 casualties per drone in monthly stats. Not all drones would directly cause casualties—some fail, are jammed, or support indirect operations—but scaled production and tech improvements (e.g., AI guidance boosting success to 70–80% in some cases) amplify impact.

In context, drones already account for 60–80% of Russian frontline losses (per RUSI reports and Ukrainian claims), with daily Russian casualties averaging ~1,200 (cumulative ~1.2 million since 2022 per Ukrainian General Staff). Extra drones could meaningfully shift battlefield dynamics, potentially saving Ukrainian lives by reducing close-quarters engagements." Conservative (talk) 04:46, December 22, 2025 (EST).

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&oldid=2178841"