Difference between revisions of "Paleocene"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: a old → an old)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
According to [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] scientists, the Paleocene epoch (period of time) dated from dated from 65 million years ago at the [[K-T Event]] at the end of the [[Jurassic]].
+
According to [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] scientists and others who hold to an old earth view, the Paleocene epoch (period of time) dated from dated from 65 million years ago at the [[K-T Event]] at the end of the [[Jurassic]]. Evolutionists assert that [[Mammals]] which had first appeared during the [[Triassic]] now had the opportunity to take over many ecological niches left vacant by the [[dinosaurs]].
  
−
Evolutionists assert that [[Mammals]] which had first appeared during the [[Triassic]] now had the opportunity to take over many ecological niches left vacant by the [[dinosaurs]].
+
== Young earth creation scientists view ==
 +
[[Young Earth Creationism|Young earth creationist]] scientist state that there are numerous lines of evidence pointing to a young earth and that the old earth [[paradigm]] is errant and has many [[anomaly|anomalies]] (for details please see: [[Geologic system]] and [[Young Earth Creationism]]).
  
−
== Young earth creationist scientists view ==
+
[[Category:Geologic Systems]]
−
[[Young earth creationist]] scientists believe that the [[Theory of evolution|evolutionary]] [[Geology|geological]] timescale is in error. <ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/geocolumn.asp</ref><ref>http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=54</ref><ref>http://www.allaboutcreation.org/geologic-time-scale.htm</ref>  These scientists believe that the earth is young and has multiple lines of evidence from the field of geology showing that the earth is young. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/geology.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationism.org/topbar/geology.htm</ref><ref>http://www.grisda.org/georpts/gr11.htm</ref><ref>http://www.nwcreation.net/geologylinks.html</ref><ref>http://globalflood.org/</ref>  Also, young earth creationist scientists assert that there is an abundance of scientific arguments in addition to geology showing the earth and universe are both approximately 6,000 years in age.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/young.asp</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/astronomy.asp</ref><ref>http://www.icr.org/article/1842/</ref>  In addition, young earth creationist scientists have a number of arguments against the position of an extremely old age for the earth and the universe.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dating.asp</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/astronomy.asp</ref><ref>http://www.apologeticspress.org/modules.php?name=Read&cat=1&itemid=22</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/0809_cdk_davies.asp</ref> [[Flood Geology|Flood geologists]] also point out that [[catastrophism]] is increasingly being accepted in the field of geology. <ref>http://www.grisda.org/origins/12061.htm</ref>
 
−
<ref>http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=print&ID=84</ref>  In addition, creationists also assert that old earth uniformitarian geology has numerous [[Anomoly|anomolies]].  For example, creationists cite the work of [[William R. Corliss]] who catalogued numerous anomalies in the old earth uniformatarian geology [[paradigm]]. <ref>http://www.science-frontiers.com/sourcebk.htm</ref><ref>http://www.apologeticspress.net/articles/184</ref> Corliss wrote regarding [[Paraconformity|paraconformities]] the following:
 
−
 
 
−
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
 
−
"Potentially more important to geological thinking are those [[unconformity|unconformities]] that signal large chunks of geological history are missing, even though the strata on either side of the unconformity are perfectly parallel and show no evidence of erosion. Did millions of years fly by with no discernible effect? A possible though controversial inference is that our geological clocks and stratigraphic concepts need working on." William R. Corliss, Unknown Earth (Glen Arm, Maryland: The Sourcebook Project, 1980), p. 219. <ref>http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/flood.html</ref>
 
−
</blockquote>
 
−
 
 
−
The secular science journal [[New Scientist]] wrote regarding Corliss's work the following: "All I can say to Corliss is carry on cataloging." <ref>http://www.science-frontiers.com/sourcebk.htm</ref>  Young earth creationist scientists assert that paraconformaties pose a serious challenge to the old earth uniformitarian geology paradigm. <ref>http://www.grisda.org/georpts/36.pdf</ref><ref>
 
−
http://www.grisda.org/2003-FSC-open/Roth-RecentCreation.htm</ref><ref>http://www.seeking-god.co.uk/id188.htm</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
==References==
 
−
<references/>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
[[Category:Geological time periods]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:57, August 8, 2016

According to evolutionary scientists and others who hold to an old earth view, the Paleocene epoch (period of time) dated from dated from 65 million years ago at the K-T Event at the end of the Jurassic. Evolutionists assert that Mammals which had first appeared during the Triassic now had the opportunity to take over many ecological niches left vacant by the dinosaurs.

Young earth creation scientists view

Young earth creationist scientist state that there are numerous lines of evidence pointing to a young earth and that the old earth paradigm is errant and has many anomalies (for details please see: Geologic system and Young Earth Creationism).

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Paleocene&oldid=1269127"