Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Bloomberg"
There are no discussions on this page.
Additioner (talk | contribs) (New page: If Bloomberg isn't a candidate, then he shouldn't be on the Template for 2008 Presidential candidates. -~~~~) |
(I doubt Bloomberg is much different from Hillary Clinton. Both support private property. I agree that Obama and Nader are quite different from Bloomberg, however.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If Bloomberg isn't a candidate, then he shouldn't be on the Template for 2008 Presidential candidates. -[[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 13:33, 22 August 2007 (EDT) | If Bloomberg isn't a candidate, then he shouldn't be on the Template for 2008 Presidential candidates. -[[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 13:33, 22 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I don't know much about Michael Bloomberg, but from what I read, he's a fiscal conservative, and liberal only on social issues. I didn't put this in the article because I don't know if it's true, but if it's, should be made clear in the article, for he's not seen as a political fully left, if he's not.--[[User:Renan Jackson|Renan Jackson]] ([[User talk:Renan Jackson|talk]]) 15:04, 10 December 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Please feel free to add that, if it is really true. Often people who are portrayed as "socially liberal but fiscally conservative" are not really all that conservative fiscally.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:14, 10 December 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I never got to see this, what i know is that [[Michael Bloomberg]] is yes a totally [[social liberalism|social liberal]], not [[libertarian]] (definition that is usually applied to [[fiscal conservative]]s [[social liberal]]s) as he's an advocate of [[gun control]] and a critic of [[limited government]]. And even if it is totally [[liberal]], including [[fiscal liberalism|fiscal liberal]], he's not a radical liberal type like [[Barack Obama]], [[Hillary Clinton]] and [[Ralph Nader]].--[[User:Renan Jackson|Renan Jackson]] ([[User talk:Renan Jackson|talk]]) 23:37, 10 December 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::I doubt Bloomberg is much different from Hillary Clinton. Both support private property. I agree that Obama and Nader are quite different from Bloomberg, however.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:04, 11 December 2015 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:04, December 11, 2015
If Bloomberg isn't a candidate, then he shouldn't be on the Template for 2008 Presidential candidates. -Additioner 13:33, 22 August 2007 (EDT)
- I don't know much about Michael Bloomberg, but from what I read, he's a fiscal conservative, and liberal only on social issues. I didn't put this in the article because I don't know if it's true, but if it's, should be made clear in the article, for he's not seen as a political fully left, if he's not.--Renan Jackson (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2015 (EST)
- Please feel free to add that, if it is really true. Often people who are portrayed as "socially liberal but fiscally conservative" are not really all that conservative fiscally.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2015 (EST)
- I never got to see this, what i know is that Michael Bloomberg is yes a totally social liberal, not libertarian (definition that is usually applied to fiscal conservatives social liberals) as he's an advocate of gun control and a critic of limited government. And even if it is totally liberal, including fiscal liberal, he's not a radical liberal type like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Ralph Nader.--Renan Jackson (talk) 23:37, 10 December 2015 (EST)
- I doubt Bloomberg is much different from Hillary Clinton. Both support private property. I agree that Obama and Nader are quite different from Bloomberg, however.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2015 (EST)