Difference between revisions of "Talk:Islam"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(194 intermediate revisions by 85 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The first section of this article is factual.
+
[[Talk:Islam/Archive 1]]
 +
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
  
−
The second half appears to be opinion. It is not a description of what U. S. policy is or has been, but of what the writer thinks it should be. Some statements in it ("The religion of Islam is one of the most, if not the most, violent religion in the world") seem far from objective. After all, it was not Muslims who started the Crusades. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:19, 8 February 2007 (EST)
+
== Why must there be a depiction of Muhammad? It's highly offensive to Muslims who might read this article. ==
  
−
"a substantial minority of accredited Western scholars believe that some Muslim beliefs, like those of the early Roman Catholic Church, system can be traced back to distinctly polytheistic antecedents" - This seems to be the sort of phrase that is attacked in Wikipedia. Every odd ball opinion can be traced to somewhere, but this is not worthy in the main article - in regard to Islam or Catholicism. [[user:stevendavy]]
+
Since you are Christian, you shouldn't be so offensive to Muslims, as both Christianity and Islam are Abrahamic religions. (I'm not Muslim, but I think purposely trying to be offensive to a group of people is not good.) You should remove the Muhammad image ASAP. Why must this website spread so much hate? [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 01:13, February 21, 2023 (EST)
−
 
+
:Interesting question. I had no idea depictions of Muhammad were a graven image, or that Muhammad was God. But I agree. It shouldn't be there just to tweek people and get them POed. Unless somebody comes up with a good reason for keeping it, I'm going to get rid of it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 01:28, February 21, 2023 (EST)
−
The article has one major flaw, and that is that it distinguishes Allah as a seperate god from that which is followed in the other abrahamic religions. This is fundamentally incorrect, The Christian, Jewish and Muslim god is the same god. [[user:djtheblade]]
+

Latest revision as of 06:37, February 21, 2023

Talk:Islam/Archive 1

! This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Conservlogo.png

Why must there be a depiction of Muhammad? It's highly offensive to Muslims who might read this article.

Since you are Christian, you shouldn't be so offensive to Muslims, as both Christianity and Islam are Abrahamic religions. (I'm not Muslim, but I think purposely trying to be offensive to a group of people is not good.) You should remove the Muhammad image ASAP. Why must this website spread so much hate? ChenXiansheng (talk) 01:13, February 21, 2023 (EST)

Interesting question. I had no idea depictions of Muhammad were a graven image, or that Muhammad was God. But I agree. It shouldn't be there just to tweek people and get them POed. Unless somebody comes up with a good reason for keeping it, I'm going to get rid of it. RobSGive Peace a chance 01:28, February 21, 2023 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Islam&oldid=1934194"