Difference between revisions of "Second Amendment Cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(rephrased) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Here are decisions cited by [[liberal]] health groups against an individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment: | + | Here are decisions cited by [[liberal]] health groups in their ''amici curiae'' briefs that they filed in ''[[D.C. v. Heller]]'' against an individual right to bear arms under the [[Second Amendment]]: |
The precedents relied upon by the ''amici brief'' of the American Public Health Association, et al.: | The precedents relied upon by the ''amici brief'' of the American Public Health Association, et al.: | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* ''[[Quilici v. Morton Grove]]'', 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1982) | * ''[[Quilici v. Morton Grove]]'', 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1982) | ||
| − | The above ''amici'' briefs completely ignore the following precedents: | + | The above two ''amici'' briefs of the American Public Health Association, et al., and the American Academy of Pediatrics, et al., completely ignore the following precedents: |
* ''[[United States v. Emerson]]'', 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001) | * ''[[United States v. Emerson]]'', 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001) | ||
* ''[[Printz v. United States]]'', 521 U.S. 898 (1997) | * ''[[Printz v. United States]]'', 521 U.S. 898 (1997) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Second Amendment rulings]] | ||
[[Category:Second Amendment]] | [[Category:Second Amendment]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:25, October 1, 2018
Here are decisions cited by liberal health groups in their amici curiae briefs that they filed in D.C. v. Heller against an individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment:
The precedents relied upon by the amici brief of the American Public Health Association, et al.:
- Bach v. Pataki, 408 F.3d 75 (2d Cir. 2005)
- Day v. State, 37 Tenn. (5 Sneed) 496 (1858)
- Fresno Rifle and Pistol Club, Inc. v. Van de Kamp, 965 F.2d 723 (9th Cir. 1992)
- Love v. Pepersack, 47 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 1995)
- Peoples Rights Org. v. City of Columbus, 152 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 1998)
- Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
- Quilici v. Vill. of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261, (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 (1983)
- Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897)
- Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2002)
- Stevens v. United States, 440 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1971)
- Thomas v. Members of City Council of Portland, 730 F.2d 41 (1st Cir. 1984)
- United States v. Darrington, 351 F.3d 632 (5th Cir. 2003)
The precedents relied upon by the amici brief of the American Academy of Pediatrics, et al.:
- Gabree v. King, 614 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1980)
- Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005)
- Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990)
- Purity Extract and Tonic Co. v. Lynch, 226 U.S. 192 (1922)
- Quilici v. Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1982)
The above two amici briefs of the American Public Health Association, et al., and the American Academy of Pediatrics, et al., completely ignore the following precedents:
- United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001)
- Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997)