Difference between revisions of "Scientific basis for creationism"
(inspired by talk page) |
Toby Chester (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Despite some disagreement from [[evolution | + | Despite some disagreement from [[evolution]]ists, the theory of [[creationism]] has strong support among [[scientist]]s across disciplines. Several [[physicist]]s - members of the [[RATE Group]] - recently concluded that a theory of accelerated radioactive decay supported a theory of a [[young earth]], and suggested flaws in [[radiometric dating]] that place the Earth's age in the billions, rather than the thousands.<ref>https://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=print&ID=114</ref> An increasing number of skeptics, including the Reverend Michael Reiss, a [[biologist]] and pastor in the [[Church of England]], suggest teaching creationism alongside evolution.<ref>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article4734767.ece</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Creation science]] | ||
| + | *[[Young earth creationism]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Science]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Creationism]] |
Latest revision as of 14:29, November 12, 2019
Despite some disagreement from evolutionists, the theory of creationism has strong support among scientists across disciplines. Several physicists - members of the RATE Group - recently concluded that a theory of accelerated radioactive decay supported a theory of a young earth, and suggested flaws in radiometric dating that place the Earth's age in the billions, rather than the thousands.[1] An increasing number of skeptics, including the Reverend Michael Reiss, a biologist and pastor in the Church of England, suggest teaching creationism alongside evolution.[2]