|
|
| (86 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
| Line 25: |
Line 25: |
| | *[[/Archive16|(March)]] | | *[[/Archive16|(March)]] |
| | *[[/Archive17|(April)]] | | *[[/Archive17|(April)]] |
| − | | + | *[[/Archive18|(May)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive19|(June)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive20|(July)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive21|(August)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive22|(November)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2012 |
| | + | *[[/Archive23|(November)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2013 |
| | + | *[[/Archive24|(July)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive25|(Decemeber)]] |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| − | ==Editing Liberal Friendship== | + | == Thoughts on clarifying some username policies. == |
| − | The edits were to correct erroneous information, remove opinion, and to put tags in to get citations for claims that were unsourced. I was under the impression that's what we do with an encyclopedia. This site isnt here to smear people. HarabecW
| + | |
| − | :First of all please sign your posts with <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> - it'll leave an automatic time-stamped signature. Secondly, this is an encyclopedia written from a [[conservative]] perspective - that's crucial for you to understand if you want to continue editing here. Thirdly, unless you have very good reason you do not revert administrators, and lastly, if you are reverted - the correct response is NOT to revert back - that's called edit warring - you've done it twice now (with Karajou and with me) and I'm quite willing to take punitive measures if you do it again.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:36, 8 May 2011 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I apologize if I went about correcting something in the wrong way, but I fail to see how this being a conservative site matters. If you want an encyclopedia, then you dont get to play cut and paste with factual events and ideas if you want to call this site an encyclopedia, as it clearly does. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 16:04, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :Read the Conservapedia Commandments, but also - just in general - if you have multiple users with block rights (Karajou actually being a sysop) reverting you, then you're doing something wrong.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 18:00, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == my edit ==
| + | |
| − | You do know that you should include Nixon acts for the Enviroment. It seems that any things that even sounds liberal you delete even of it is a fact. You can't slant facts. As I don't have as much time as you seem to have you should also include he ended the draft.{{unsigned|Conservative134}}
| + | |
| − | :Congress ended the draft, not Nixon. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:10, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | I reverted you ([http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Nixon&diff=next&oldid=867509 here]) not for your content but because you very clearly copied from Wikipedia. You even left in the citation number (that stray "[108]"? I know what that is). So, again, let's be clear, I reverted your edit because it was careless plagiarism - it had nothing to do with content censorship. Also, new sections go on the bottom of talk pages and you should sign your edits (<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>).--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 16:01, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Replied==
| + | |
| − | Sent you one back, dear sir! :) [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:13, 27 May 2011 (EDT)
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | ==#1 on Google==
| + | Please check your email so I can ask some questions about these.--[[User:ChrisB00|ChrisB00]] 17:16, 19 February 2014 (EST) |
| − | [[Barack Hussein Obama]], since the recent upgrade, has lead frogged ahead of Wikipedia's article, and Mr. Barack Obama's very own website to occupy the [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ACAW_enUS425US426&q=barack+hussein+obama #1 position on Google]. Thank you, it was a brilliant idea, and very well executed. It is someting you need to be very proud, and we all appreciate your excellent work. | + | |
| | | | |
| − | If I can be of any futher assistance, please don't hesitate to let me know. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:25, 5 June 2011 (EDT)
| + | Also, I don't know why this posted three times.--[[User:ChrisB00|ChrisB00]] 17:18, 19 February 2014 (EST) |
| | + | :I deleted the extra sections. Responded to your email - feel free to ask any questions. Just so everyone knows what I sent/to clarify: Username policy is that you use your first name and last initial; you might see a few users who don't fit under that policy (Conservative, Karajou - even I use the opposite (although your first initial last name would also be okay)), but that is because those users predate the policy.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 18:11, 19 February 2014 (EST) |
