Difference between revisions of "User:PeterKa"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(format)
(rework)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[User:PeterKa/Filipacchi | Here]] is the user page that got me banned from Wikipedia. In May, there was a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive797 huge discussion about it] and it was finally rev-deleted. A feminist oversighter blocked me a couple of weeks later. At the time, there was some handwaving and a lame rationale about edit warring. But I think it is safe to say that my block and ban were generally understood as ideological. You can also read my [[User:PeterKa/Arbcom | Arbcom appeal]].
+
"Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome in your user namespace," according to Wikipedia policy. But I found out the hard way that [[User:PeterKa/Filipacchi | this kind of essay]] is not so welcome. In May, there was a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive797 huge discussion about it] and it was finally rev-deleted. A feminist oversighter blocked me a couple of weeks later. At the time, there was some handwaving and a lame rationale about edit warring. But I think it is safe to say that my block and ban were generally understood as ideological. You can read the full story in my [[User:PeterKa/Arbcom | Arbcom appeal]].

Revision as of 01:17, December 17, 2013

"Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome in your user namespace," according to Wikipedia policy. But I found out the hard way that this kind of essay is not so welcome. In May, there was a huge discussion about it and it was finally rev-deleted. A feminist oversighter blocked me a couple of weeks later. At the time, there was some handwaving and a lame rationale about edit warring. But I think it is safe to say that my block and ban were generally understood as ideological. You can read the full story in my Arbcom appeal.