SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
"Overwhelmingly rejected" is not the same as being "wrong". If I simply wanted to say that it is wrong, I wouldn't have put this much effort (and a lot more to come) into the article.
The paper claims an apparent decay trend that levels off as time goes on, and which has the added benefit of accelerating nuclear decay.
The paper claims an apparent decay trend that levels off as time goes on, and which has the added benefit of accelerating nuclear decay.
This theory is overwhelmingly rejected by the scientific community.
The data are summarized in two graphs.
The data are summarized in two graphs.