Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coal mining"
(References) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::Noticed you added an edit without providing a reference, any chance you could do so? Coal is on a decline in India; all the future proposed coal plants are being canceled and are to be replaced by renewable sources. Thought you’d like to know. <ref> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/world/asia/india-coal-green-energy-climate.html </ref>--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 16:34, 30 June 2017 (EDT) | ::::Noticed you added an edit without providing a reference, any chance you could do so? Coal is on a decline in India; all the future proposed coal plants are being canceled and are to be replaced by renewable sources. Thought you’d like to know. <ref> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/world/asia/india-coal-green-energy-climate.html </ref>--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 16:34, 30 June 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::::Coal declining in India? Is Associated Press just reported that it has been expanding this year: [http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/26/coal-rise-china-us-and-india-after-major-2016-drop/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:39, 1 July 2017 (EDT) | :::::Coal declining in India? Is Associated Press just reported that it has been expanding this year: [http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/26/coal-rise-china-us-and-india-after-major-2016-drop/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:39, 1 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This was a nice informative article, that is, until recently. Not only has unreferenced information been added, it has now migrated to the second line. Jpatt challenged me to provide references for my assertion about the decline of coal and the rising cost of using coal for power generation. I did then added the information, it seems I satisfied this administrator for there was no complaint. Conservative on the other hand has added unreferenced tidbits and then moved these bits to the beginning of the article. I was reminded by JDano not to insert opinion into the articles. Conservative’s edit concerning Trump and Obama is nothing but speculative opinion without a reference. Sigh…--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 11:44, 1 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:44, July 1, 2017
| ! | Part of this article was copied from Conservapedia but the copied text was originally written by me, RJJensen (under the name Richard Jensen) and does not include alterations made by others on that site. |
RJJensen 22:31, 14 November 2008 (EST)
Updates Needed
Some of the information in this article is out of date. For instance, coal is now one of the most expensive means of electrical production. Natural gas has surpassed coal as a major energy source. Changes should be made for the sake of accuracy. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_08_04.html https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
- Anti-coal policy and anti-coal government regulations raised the cost of coal. Still likely cheaper than most other sources but you do have a link! Maybe research other nations use of coal first. --Jpatt 21:45, 19 April 2017 (EDT)
Why was a critique of Spanish renewable energy generation added to an article about coal mining? Doesn’t make any sense. --GinnyS (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
- It shows that moving away from coal power and coal mining, whether for environmental benefits or to improve the health of coal miners, is not necessarily beneficial. --1990'sguy (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
- I’m sure you believe what you’re saying, but this is an article about coal mining, not a critique of renewable energy. Instead of complaining about renewable energy in this article, why not make the complaint in an appropriate article, say like, renewable energy?--GinnyS (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
- Thanks for the feedback. I added two more facts about coal. Conservative (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
- I’m sure you believe what you’re saying, but this is an article about coal mining, not a critique of renewable energy. Instead of complaining about renewable energy in this article, why not make the complaint in an appropriate article, say like, renewable energy?--GinnyS (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
This was a nice informative article, that is, until recently. Not only has unreferenced information been added, it has now migrated to the second line. Jpatt challenged me to provide references for my assertion about the decline of coal and the rising cost of using coal for power generation. I did then added the information, it seems I satisfied this administrator for there was no complaint. Conservative on the other hand has added unreferenced tidbits and then moved these bits to the beginning of the article. I was reminded by JDano not to insert opinion into the articles. Conservative’s edit concerning Trump and Obama is nothing but speculative opinion without a reference. Sigh…--GinnyS (talk) 11:44, 1 July 2017 (EDT)