Difference between revisions of "Beef"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Beef is the [[meat]] of [[cattle]]. The word 'beef' is related to the French word ''beof'' which [[English culinary terms from French|became part of the English language]] during the [[Norman Conquest]]. Roast beef, especially in the form of a [[Sunday roast]], is the national dish of [[England]]. | Beef is the [[meat]] of [[cattle]]. The word 'beef' is related to the French word ''beof'' which [[English culinary terms from French|became part of the English language]] during the [[Norman Conquest]]. Roast beef, especially in the form of a [[Sunday roast]], is the national dish of [[England]]. | ||
| − | + | Conservapedia is horribly biased and cannot be read for any intellectual gain. The people who run iit are blinded by their own ignorance, racism, and prejudice. Just because someone believes something different than another person, does not mean we can condemn that one person. Wikipedia, on the other hand, actually is based on facts. Mass amounts of science compare nothing to a book that's 2000 years old apparently. Instead of hurtling to an end of death and destruction, we can promote equality, change, and science. This site is one hundred times as biased and untruthful as wikipedia. Encyclopedia Brittanica also has articles on evolution, but its not persecuted because it got tons of sources. You can all deserve to be imprisoned for promoting hate and stupidity. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 21:42, June 28, 2007
Beef is the meat of cattle. The word 'beef' is related to the French word beof which became part of the English language during the Norman Conquest. Roast beef, especially in the form of a Sunday roast, is the national dish of England.
Conservapedia is horribly biased and cannot be read for any intellectual gain. The people who run iit are blinded by their own ignorance, racism, and prejudice. Just because someone believes something different than another person, does not mean we can condemn that one person. Wikipedia, on the other hand, actually is based on facts. Mass amounts of science compare nothing to a book that's 2000 years old apparently. Instead of hurtling to an end of death and destruction, we can promote equality, change, and science. This site is one hundred times as biased and untruthful as wikipedia. Encyclopedia Brittanica also has articles on evolution, but its not persecuted because it got tons of sources. You can all deserve to be imprisoned for promoting hate and stupidity.