Changes

Antitrust cases (view source)

Revision as of 03:26, November 1, 2022

119 bytes added , 03:26, November 1, 2022

no edit summary

Line 29: Line 29:

== Antitrust ==

+

*Apani Sw., Inc. v. Coca-Cola Enters., 300 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2002) (alleged market for bottled water did not comport with commercial realities, and thus an antitrust claim was dismissed)

*''Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. Am. Quarter Horse Ass’n'', 776 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2015) (“[E]ssential attributes of illegal monopoly power are judged by the monopolist’s participation in the relevant market.”)

*''Adams v. Am. Bar Assoc.'', 400 F. Supp. 219 (E.D. Pa. 1975) (“The antitrust laws ... do not reach conduct which the plaintiffs perceive as a monopoly of free trade in ideas.”)

Line 52: Line 53:

== Other ==

−

*Apani Sw., Inc. v. Coca-Cola Enters., 300 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2002)

*''Bell v. Bk. of Am. Home Loan Svc., L.P.'', 2012 WL 568755 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2012) (declaratory judgment action needs viable underlying claim)

*Chair King, Inc. v. Houston Cellular Corp., 131 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 1997), ''abrogated on other grounds'', Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 565 U.S. 368 (2012)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,194

edits