Changes

And we see [[al-Qaeda]] placed under "Leftist."  Leftist then proceeds to propound Marxist-Leninist motivations.  Now, it can be argued Al-Qaeda can fit under either of these definitions, but debating which is more appropriate may not be helpful.  The fundamental problem is the spectrum theory itself.  And this simply appears, once again, of trying to pigeon-hole a square peg into a round hole.

And we see [[al-Qaeda]] placed under "Leftist."  Leftist then proceeds to propound Marxist-Leninist motivations.  Now, it can be argued Al-Qaeda can fit under either of these definitions, but debating which is more appropriate may not be helpful.  The fundamental problem is the spectrum theory itself.  And this simply appears, once again, of trying to pigeon-hole a square peg into a round hole.

So, while some, if not most of the material is good, it probably needs reorganization.  That is, we should probably remove the subheads and not try to assign some or all extreme terrorist groups to an ideological cless defined by the spectrum theory.  While discussion of tradition Marxist-Leftist terrorism is valuable, nonetheless, the spectrum theory is not definitive of all politcal motivations.  Some groups come together simply out of the practical necessity of the moment, irregardless and irrespective of an underlying ideology of its members, that is to say, not all political activity (in this case, I'm referring to extremist political activity) is ideologically driven.  This is the fundamental flaw of the spectrum theory.  Therefore, we should not perpetuate a flawed theory by assigning questionable motives to groups on other pages outside the [[Political spectrum]] article.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:13, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

So, while some, if not most of the material is good, it probably needs reorganization.  That is, we should probably remove the subheads and not try to assign some or all extreme terrorist groups to an ideological class defined by the spectrum theory.  While discussion of tradition Marxist-Leftist terrorism is valuable, nonetheless, the spectrum theory is not definitive of all politcal motivations.  Some groups come together simply out of the practical necessity of the moment, irregardless and irrespective of an underlying ideology of its members, that is to say, not all political activity (in this case, I'm referring to extremist political activity) is ideologically driven.  This is the fundamental flaw of the spectrum theory.  Therefore, we should not perpetuate a flawed theory by assigning questionable motives to groups on other pages outside the [[Political spectrum]] article.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:13, 22 June 2007 (EDT)