Difference between revisions of "Talk:Racism"
m (ugh spelling) |
(Watchdog Groups) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I've heard it say that affirmative action is racist, and to some point I agree with it, though only on a technicality. However, this is an opinion, not a fact, and as such should be cited and attributed, per the [[conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 8 October 2007 (EDT) | I've heard it say that affirmative action is racist, and to some point I agree with it, though only on a technicality. However, this is an opinion, not a fact, and as such should be cited and attributed, per the [[conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 8 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Watchdog Groups == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The quote from [[Laird Wilcox]] was rather unrelated to the subject. It dealt with a specific sub-group of persons dealing with racism in society, but within a larger context of watchdog groups. It changes the focus and the bent of the entire article, and I feel it is not helpful nor needed in this context. | ||
Revision as of 20:34, November 30, 2007
I guess we need a definition of what is meant by "institutionalized", then. RobS 10:25, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
cut:
- Racism is
the process of making judgments based on race. Racism is making broad generalizations about a group of people based on perceived notions, (see prejudice) and then making such generalizations part of society.prejudice and discrimination based on race.
I'm using Diane Ravitch's definition, because it's shorter. --Ed Poor 08:28, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Affirmative action
I've heard it say that affirmative action is racist, and to some point I agree with it, though only on a technicality. However, this is an opinion, not a fact, and as such should be cited and attributed, per the Commandments. HelpJazz 22:39, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
Watchdog Groups
The quote from Laird Wilcox was rather unrelated to the subject. It dealt with a specific sub-group of persons dealing with racism in society, but within a larger context of watchdog groups. It changes the focus and the bent of the entire article, and I feel it is not helpful nor needed in this context.