Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: − +
no edit summary
Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which suffers from anti-Christian and liberal bias. On Wikipedia, dates are given in anti-Christian CE instead of AD, which Conservapedia uses. Christianity is given no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, especially those of the Renaissance. Wikipedia's liberal editors even removed and blocked an entire page describing Wikipedia's bias. Wikipedia has gone the way of CBS News. It's long overdue to have FOX News-like competition.
Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which suffers from anti-Christian and liberal bias. On Wikipedia, dates are given in anti-Christian CE instead of AD, which Conservapedia uses. Christianity is given no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, especially those of the Renaissance. Wikipedia's liberal editors even removed and blocked an entire page describing Wikipedia's bias. Wikipedia defaced an entry there about Conservapedia. Wikipedia has gone the way of CBS News. It's long overdue to have FOX News-like competition.