Changes

Line 88: Line 88:     
:::::  Clement, if you want me to respond to your comments, then you have to respond to mine.  There's no disputing that Protestants were the leaders in attacking Copernicus, and that the Catholic reaction was in the wake of the Protestant attack.  I'm not criticizing the Protestants, but am debunking the myth that the Catholic position on this particular issue was more objectionable than the Protestant one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:49, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:::::  Clement, if you want me to respond to your comments, then you have to respond to mine.  There's no disputing that Protestants were the leaders in attacking Copernicus, and that the Catholic reaction was in the wake of the Protestant attack.  I'm not criticizing the Protestants, but am debunking the myth that the Catholic position on this particular issue was more objectionable than the Protestant one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:49, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: ''There's no disputing that Protestants were the leaders in attacking Copernicus, and that the Catholic reaction was in the wake of the Protestant attack. '' Sorry, but E. Rosen in the article above does exactly this: he disputes that Protestants were the leaders, and that the Catholics only reacted. It seems that both held positions  equally objectionable, while in your lecture, you ''are'' criticizing the Protestants exclusively. [[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 18:14, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
    
== Second Attempt ==
 
== Second Attempt ==
178

edits