Difference between revisions of "User talk:JosephMac"
(Sweeping claims based on "authorities" are disfavored here, and I'm inclined to revert the statements disavowing Pauline authorship of certain Epistles unless others demonstrate why that disavowal s) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::"Factually accurate", JosephMac, does not include a [[liberal deceit|liberal]] POV. Wikipedia also says its articles are "factually accurate", but it is a truism they are not, being so riddled with liberal bias and ideology as they are. You should open your mind and try to discern the truth, rise above the indoctrination you have obviously been the recipient of. It will indeed set you free. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT) | ::"Factually accurate", JosephMac, does not include a [[liberal deceit|liberal]] POV. Wikipedia also says its articles are "factually accurate", but it is a truism they are not, being so riddled with liberal bias and ideology as they are. You should open your mind and try to discern the truth, rise above the indoctrination you have obviously been the recipient of. It will indeed set you free. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pauline authorship == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sweeping claims based on "authorities" are disfavored here, and I'm inclined to revert the statements disavowing Pauline authorship of certain Epistles unless others demonstrate why that disavowal should remain.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:51, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:51, December 7, 2009
Welcome!
Hello, JosephMac, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, JosephMac!
Final Warning
You have previously been asked to make substantiative contributions here, as opposed to merely arguing for politically correct, world-view nonsense. You are failing to do so. There will not be further warnings, appeals or reprieves, just to be perfectly clear. You have too good a mind to be so clouded by clearly moronic liberal ideology. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:11, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
- TK, please would you be kind enough to explain which of my edit are "politically correct, world-view nonsense". I'm aiming to make CP trustworthy, as it claims in its masthead, which at a minimum means factually accurate. JosephMac 18:30, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
- "Factually accurate", JosephMac, does not include a liberal POV. Wikipedia also says its articles are "factually accurate", but it is a truism they are not, being so riddled with liberal bias and ideology as they are. You should open your mind and try to discern the truth, rise above the indoctrination you have obviously been the recipient of. It will indeed set you free. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
Pauline authorship
Sweeping claims based on "authorities" are disfavored here, and I'm inclined to revert the statements disavowing Pauline authorship of certain Epistles unless others demonstrate why that disavowal should remain.--Andy Schlafly 20:51, 6 December 2009 (EST)