Difference between revisions of "Talk:Definition of abortion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(As both comments above illustrate, taken together, the definition of abortion is an issue of its own, thereby justifying a separate entry.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Is not the page titled abortion not in fact the definition of abortion?  I do not see why this deserves its own page.  It should just redirect back to "Abortion".  -- [[User:NorthernSights]][[User_talk:NorthernSights|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:51, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
 
Is not the page titled abortion not in fact the definition of abortion?  I do not see why this deserves its own page.  It should just redirect back to "Abortion".  -- [[User:NorthernSights]][[User_talk:NorthernSights|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:51, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
: As both comments above illustrate, taken together, the definition of [[abortion]] is an issue of its own, thereby justifying a separate entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:17, 11 June 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 02:17, June 12, 2010

In the medical community, an abortion is the loss of the fetus by any cause. For example, a spontaneous abortion is more commonly referred to as a miscarriage. Though the word "abortion" is more commonly associated with a medical professional causing the death of the fetus then extracting it, I think it would be important to distinguish the difference in the common and medical connotations. -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 15:17, 31 March 2010 (EDT)

Is not the page titled abortion not in fact the definition of abortion? I do not see why this deserves its own page. It should just redirect back to "Abortion". -- User:NorthernSightsDiscussion 13:51, 11 June 2010 (EDT)

As both comments above illustrate, taken together, the definition of abortion is an issue of its own, thereby justifying a separate entry.--Andy Schlafly 22:17, 11 June 2010 (EDT)