Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(related concept) |
m (link is not substantive enough to be included) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters | * [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters | ||
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]] | * [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]] | ||
| − | * [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]] | + | * [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]] and the other [[counterexamples to evolution]] |
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity | * [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity | ||
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity. | * Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity. | ||
Revision as of 05:10, March 4, 2011
Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. A related concept is the fallacy of invincible ignorance. Examples of deliberate ignorance include:
- Howard Dean, a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that taxpayer-funded abortion increases the number of abortions[1]
- abortionists refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have abortions
- refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of Richard Sternberg, whom they ostracize for having published an intelligent design article
- Democrats refusing to acknowledge Barack Obama's appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters
- materialists refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for migration and homing
- evolutionists refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the whale and the other counterexamples to evolution
- liberals refuse to address how socialism destroys productivity
- Advocates of the global warming theory refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.
- Liberal cafeteria Christians refuse to consider Bible verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say.
- Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts.
- atheists refuse to acknowledge a priori philosophical proofs of the existence of God, and specifically the Christian god, such as the ontological argument; they also fail to provide proof and evidence that there is no God.
(add more)
Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:
- "I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by liberals[2])
- "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look)
- "I've never seen that in the New York Times!"
- "That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!"
- "Let's talk about something else!"
- "I'm not interested in that!"
- "They hate us for our freedom!"
- "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
- "That offends me!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic)
- "You're persecuting me!" (when the "persecution" consists only of pointing out inconvenient facts or logic)
Crime of Deliberate Ignorance
Deliberate ignorance can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."[3]