Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 143:
Line 143: + + + +
→changes to the evolution article: new section
more of the article is spent disproving evolution than explaining it (which is barely done at all).
more of the article is spent disproving evolution than explaining it (which is barely done at all).
:::Given discrimination, how many are eager to answer surveys or go public? Second, science is not a voting booth. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:43, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
:::Given discrimination, how many are eager to answer surveys or go public? Second, science is not a voting booth. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:43, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
== changes to the evolution article ==
Although the article is a thorn in the side of many internet atheists/evolutionists (as it cites evolutionists candidly admitting the many fatal and serious weaknesses of the evolutionary paradigm) and continues to be a well trafficked article at Conservapedia, Conservapedia is considering making some changes to the CP evolution article. Of course, evolutionist devotees and other cranks will play no part in the revisions. There is no pressing need to do this, however, given that the [[Question evolution! campaign]] will grind away at evolutionary nonsense with great alacrity as [[Shockofgod]] will be promoting the campaign "full throttle". :) [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbmAn3M8r0I] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:45, 9 August 2011 (EDT)