47
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 79:
Line 79: +
no edit summary
No I do not see how that explains anything. What you just said makes absolutely no sense. I'm puzzled that you can actually read or write, because you certainly do not show any clarity. It seems like the only arguments you have are you declaring atheism is coming to and end and citing Christian websites. [[User:Clarkbc|Clarkbc]] 01:28, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
No I do not see how that explains anything. What you just said makes absolutely no sense. I'm puzzled that you can actually read or write, because you certainly do not show any clarity. It seems like the only arguments you have are you declaring atheism is coming to and end and citing Christian websites. [[User:Clarkbc|Clarkbc]] 01:28, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
::Clarkbc, setting aside the Book of Revelation which certainly speaks of "the end" which I have never mentioned in relation to atheism, where did I ever say that atheism would come to an end and what sources did I employ? Did I not rather provide resources concerning the [[Decline of atheism]]? Are you engaging in sloppy thinking and "argumentation" and/or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). Second, are you familiar with the genetic fallacy and are you once again engaging in sloppy thinking and argumentation? By the way, deep down we know that atheism is already intellectually dead and that is why the ex-militant atheist and agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] (we know the so called [[weak atheism]] is dressed up covert agnosticism and also intellectually dead), has a [[Atheism and cowardice|cowardice problem]] when it comes to debating conservative Christianity. Feel free to engage in [[last wordism]] at this point. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 04:15, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
::Clarkbc, setting aside the Book of Revelation which certainly speaks of "the end" which I have never mentioned in relation to atheism, where did I ever say that atheism would come to an end and what sources did I employ? Did I not rather provide resources concerning the [[Decline of atheism]]? Are you engaging in sloppy thinking and "argumentation" and/or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). Second, are you familiar with the genetic fallacy and are you once again engaging in sloppy thinking and argumentation? By the way, deep down we know that atheism is already intellectually dead and that is why the ex-militant atheist and agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] (we know the so called [[weak atheism]] is dressed up covert agnosticism and also intellectually dead), has a [[Atheism and cowardice|cowardice problem]] when it comes to debating conservative Christianity. Feel free to engage in [[last wordism]] at this point. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 04:15, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
:::Wow--just checking this thread again. Clarkbc doesn't seem to want to engage in an actual discussion about the facts. I fear for the future of our country when debates digress into name-calling. I can see now why this page is locked: many who might edit it have no interest in advancing the discussion for the greater good. Although I do disagree that, "those who attempt to crush anti-evolutionary dissent are no match for the growing grassroots." You should never underestimate the strength of a theory that had been around for 150 years. [[User:Scottma|Scottma]] 15:38, 2 April 2012 (EDT)