Difference between revisions of "User talk:BobbyD"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Read the relevant edit summary. The removal was explained there. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 20:10, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
 
Read the relevant edit summary. The removal was explained there. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 20:10, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
 
:Your edit summary doesn't back up what you're saying.  Administration was fine with this edit for nearly two weeks.  Why should you be the one to remove this information?--[[User:BobbyD|BobbyD]] 20:14, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
 
:Your edit summary doesn't back up what you're saying.  Administration was fine with this edit for nearly two weeks.  Why should you be the one to remove this information?--[[User:BobbyD|BobbyD]] 20:14, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
 +
::I'm sure the only reason the Administration was fine with it was because it's a fairly obscure article and so the parody went unnoticed. Maybe you should wait longer than twenty minutes after opening an account before trying to be an Internet Tough Guy. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 20:16, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:16, June 14, 2013

"revert unexplained removal of information"

Read the relevant edit summary. The removal was explained there. EddyJ 20:10, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

Your edit summary doesn't back up what you're saying. Administration was fine with this edit for nearly two weeks. Why should you be the one to remove this information?--BobbyD 20:14, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
I'm sure the only reason the Administration was fine with it was because it's a fairly obscure article and so the parody went unnoticed. Maybe you should wait longer than twenty minutes after opening an account before trying to be an Internet Tough Guy. EddyJ 20:16, 13 June 2013 (EDT)