Difference between revisions of "Third way of evolution"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] which is also known as [[Neo-Darwinism]] (see: [[Recent clamour to revise the modern evolutionary synthesis]]), but they refuse to accept biblical [[creation]] or [[intelligent design]] theory. | Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] which is also known as [[Neo-Darwinism]] (see: [[Recent clamour to revise the modern evolutionary synthesis]]), but they refuse to accept biblical [[creation]] or [[intelligent design]] theory. | ||
| − | A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities (such as the University of Chicago, University of Oxford, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and other major universities around the world). have formed a "third way" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows: | + | A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities (such as the University of Chicago, University of Oxford, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and other major universities around the world). have formed a "third way of evolution" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows: |
{{cquote|The [[DNA]] record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations... | {{cquote|The [[DNA]] record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations... | ||
Revision as of 06:45, September 23, 2014
Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the modern evolutionary synthesis which is also known as Neo-Darwinism (see: Recent clamour to revise the modern evolutionary synthesis), but they refuse to accept biblical creation or intelligent design theory.
A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities (such as the University of Chicago, University of Oxford, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and other major universities around the world). have formed a "third way of evolution" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows:
| “ | The DNA record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations...
Many see evolution as a complex process with distinct mechanisms and stages rather than a phenomenon explainable by a small number of principles. The divergences and multiplicity of ideas, opinions and theories on this website are necessary since many fields of evolutionary biology remain relatively unexplored... There is a need for a more open “third way” of discussing evolutionary change based on empirical observations.[1] |
” |
For more information, please the Evolution News and Views article entitled: A Group of Darwin-Skeptical Scientists Seeking a "Third Way" in Biology Have Launched a New Website; Welcome to Them!