Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 94:
Line 94: − + − + + − + This is quite an interesting accusation. I thought that I was simply pointing out that the entry as written was deficient, in that it contained no references and seemed to present an unjustified diatribe against what the author perceived to be 'liberals'. Not knowing any liberals, myself, I would like to know where i can find such information, so as to read about them, and convince myself that the statements are true. As to defacing, I did not change ONE ITEM of text that you wrote, hence I do not consider that defacement. --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 18:05, 20 April 2007 (EDT) </nowiki>+ − + + + + + +
If it's true, you should shout it from the mountain tops.
Ah, you mean like the following interchange on A.Schafly's talk page just before I was banned...
Ah, you mean like the following interchange on A.Schafly's talk page just before I was banned...
<nowiki> == Response to accusations of ideology ==
<nowiki>== Response to accusations of ideology ==</nowiki>
<nowiki>This is quite an interesting accusation. I thought that I was simply pointing out that the entry as written was deficient, in that it contained no references and seemed to present an unjustified diatribe against what the author perceived to be 'liberals'. Not knowing any liberals, myself, I would like to know where i can find such information, so as to read about them, and convince myself that the statements are true. As to defacing, I did not change ONE ITEM of text that you wrote, hence I do not consider that defacement. --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 18:05, 20 April 2007 (EDT)</nowiki>
--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 07:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 07:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
You were not "banned" - you are still here. To "ban" means to exclude permanently from the project. Please don't use inflammatory language.
Your account was blocked for three days because of "sarcasm". You had said that you didn't know any liberals.
Instead of engaging me here in a low-traffic area of the site, perhaps you'd like to make your points in a more prominent place, such as [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)